I asked Ryan a few questions on the background of his research. From his explanation and his Powerpoint on Friday, Ryan is trying to convert various oils (olive, vegetable, among others) into biodiesel using enzymes. He explained that to convert oils into biodiesel, you need some sort of catalyst. Two examples of catalysts in the conversion of biodiesel are enzymes and acid/base reactions. Since his mentor Dr. Maslowsky is already involved in converting oils into biodiesel with acid/base reactions, Ryan decided to take the other catalyst and use enzymes in his reaction. I asked what the purpose of his experiment was since scientists have already discovered ways to convert vegetable oils into biodiesel. He answered that although there are ways to convert vegetable oils into biodiesel, tweaking different chemicals, amounts, and procedures in the process could alter the biodiesel yield in his final product.
Leading up to today, Ryan tried to create biodiesel out of certain oils using 95% and absolute ethanol. With little luck in producing a significant amount of biodiesel, Ryan decided today to use methanol. He explained that the alcohols were used in the reaction to combine with the oils to exchange esters, leading up to
![]() |
| Process of converting oil into Biodiesel http://utahbiodieselsupply.com/gettingstarted.php |
Comparing my experience with Ryan’s research and my own, we have a lot of similarities and differences. One thing with both shared is that we both had unforeseen speed bumps in our experiment. In his, he was working with the IR machine instead of the NMR. He was also using a vacuum filtration system that looked like a machine used in Thomas Edison’s time. He explained that as with the NMR, the newer and better vacuum was not working. He explained that this less efficient vacuum may poise consequences in his results. I also had issues, particularly my cells. With my first video, I used too much light with the microscope. This caused the Dicty cells to ball up instead of move towards the food gradient. We also shared mundane and drawn out procedures in our experiments. For Ryan, it was simply the time needed for his reactions to take place. He said that he would sometimes have to let some of his solutions sit out for days to get the water out of them. He also said the hours needed to incubate his solutions were a time consuming process.
The drawn out part in my experiment is the care needed to keep my cells alive. I need to make sure that they are not overcrowded on their dishes. So every day or two, I have to wash the Petri-dishes, pull the cells off, count how many cells there are, figure the concentration of cells needed, and then finally re-plate the cells.
We also have some unique differences in our research experiences. One of them is the amount of time the mentor is with us. I asked how much time Dr. Maslowsky is with him while he does the experiment. He said not very often, since Dr. Maslowsky has his own J-term. He said he’ll discuss problems or ideas, but for the most part he is solo in his experiments. This lone ranger approach is the opposite in my research. With Dr. Cooper heading this class as well as constantly running through the DNA lab helping other students, I can always find her and ask her question about my research, what procedures I should use, and what the significance of certain steps. Another difference is the research differences. The reason I chose to work with Ryan instead of Ty or even Kara, is that Ryan had chemistry as his central science in his research. I also had some chemistry in my research as well, but mine is predominantly a biological research experience. It was quite a difference going from strict cleanliness requirements to using only chemicals in your experiments.
I am glad I chose to shadow Ryan for my assignment this week. Ryan’s research gave me a break from the DNA lab and let me into a different form of research that was solely based in chemistry. It was also interesting to know that the biodiesel he is making is used in everyday life. Shadowing a fellow researcher definitely gave me an insight into another’s work, and broadened my conception of what research was all about.

Casey,
ReplyDeleteCan you think of any advantages to having a research advisor taking an off-hands approach? Dr. Cooper's method works well for me, but I could understand how Dr. Maslowsky's would work well for others.
Ty
Ty,
ReplyDeleteI think having an off-hands approach would help a student to figure out problems on their own and to use their own ideas and creativity to solve a problem they are having. However, having Dr. Cooper on hand helps a new researcher such as myself with problems I can eventually do on my own with experience. Thanks for the comment
Casey,
ReplyDeleteI like your use of the diagram. It outlines the research in the big picture perspective. I also thought that you did an excellent job of tying it back to your own research. I also shadowed Ryan and I found my experience to be quite similar.
Casey,
ReplyDeleteSo does this make you want to approach a research project within the chemical field or do you think that you'll stay in the biological field? Also I agree with you in your comment about having a mentor who is hands on or around because it helps you understand and grasp ideas better when they are there to talk to. Very nice!
Felicia,
ReplyDeleteAlthough the strict chemistry experience was something new to see, I think I will stay in the biological field for future research. I've always had a greater liking to Biology compared to Chemistry, and it seems like you can make an experiment on just about anything in the Biological field since Biology is so complex.
you have explained a good amount of detail about Ryan's experiment. I liked the way how you compared his research with your own research... Just a concern.. Was Ryan fine with you revealing this detail of his research in a blog?
ReplyDeleteI agree...my research is mostly behavioral effects due to a little chemistry. Do you feel that having previous knowledge in this field has helped Ryan in his research? Or does it make him more relaxed and almost biased in terms of how he is conducting his experiment?
ReplyDeleteCasey,
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with most of the comments that you have already got above; you have done a great job of explaining Ryan's research project and putting it, to some extent, in your own perspective as you have related it to your own research. I am also interested about the fact that you have brought up several points of similarities and differences between your research and Ryan's, minor and major ones, which supports the idea that lots of different factors can affect a science research. I am glad you have implied that in your post. My only question for you would be, do you believe that Ryan's research is one which can be done here at Loras in the lab that we have got? I mean you have already pointed out the fact that he is missing couple of instrunments that he would need for his procedure. So, is the lab he is working in the right one for the level of complexity and advancement that his research has? I am not trying to challenge the lab or ryan's research; but I am requesting you to share what you have observed.Thank you in advance. Fantastic job in general.
Utsha,
ReplyDeleteI forgot to ask him and will do so ASAP: Thank you for pointing that out!
Cara,
I feel coming from my point of view that too much knowledge in a field is better than too little. Most of my problems in my experiment could have been avoided if I had more months or even years researching and performing research. However, I can also see your point in that too much knowledge in a field can also be detrimental to a one's research. Good question!
Manny,
I do believe that Loras College has the capibilities to run Ryan's experiment. The one to ask would be Ryan becuase he is the one running the experiment, but what he told me is that it was a bad time to start doing his research since both the vacuum filtration system and the NMR were down due to the flooding and mechanical errors. I also had issues with flooding in using the microscope, but Loras still has the tools needed to run my experiment. Great question!
Casey,
ReplyDeleteYou did a good job explaining how both you and Ryan are facing some problems in your experiments. I am also facing lots of problems in mine. The cells with GFP which were supposed to glow are not glowing but the cells without GFP are. And I am sure that everyone is in same boat. I found a very interesting definition of 'research problem' which says something like this- "Defining a research problem is the fuel that drives the scientific process, and is the foundation of any research method and experimental design, from true experiment to case study." So, in my opinion, the problems that we are facing right now are actually the foundations which will lead us to our ultimate goal.
Definition was obtained from:
http://www.experiment-resources.com/defining-a-research-problem.html#ixzz1B4EmvRFd